Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UT 83 - State v. Chapoose

State v. Chapoose’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Dunn · Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission · State v. Brown · Jensen v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court may suspend execution of sentence and consider probation to a residential sexual abuse treatment center only if all of the following circumstances are found.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The decision to grant or deny probation is at the discretion of the trial court, and we review it under an abuse of discretion standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.