Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 119 - Winters v. Schulman

Winters v. Schulman’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
8
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2025

1 district · 16 state decisions

1201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Club · World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp. · Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schettler · Rollins v. Petersen · 117 Wis. 2d 563 - Belleville State Bank v. Steele

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[iin determining the validity of a lis pendens, courts have generally restricted their review to the face of the complaint”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “affecting the title to, or the right of possession of, real property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Allowing a lis pendens to be filed in [Colorado] when the action is pending in anoth er state actually provides prospective purchasers of real property in [Colorado] with more protection than if a lis pendens could only be filed in connection with an action commenced in [Colorado]. Applying [seetion 38-35-110] to out-of-state judicial proceedings provides prospective purchasers with notice of all actions that may affect the property, not just those pending in [Colorado].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.