Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 123 - State v. Hollen

State v. Hollen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Van Hook v. United States · 77 Cal. App. 2d 734 - People v. Quinn · State v. Hitchcock · State v. Beatty · Buczynski v. Industrial Com'n of Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a jury verdict, we recite the facts and draw inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.