Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 126 - Lee v. Barnes

Lee v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Winegar v. Froerer Corp. · Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort · Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co. · Faulkner v. Farnsworth · Nielsen v. O'REILLY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contracts 'should be read as a whole, in an attempt to harmonize and give effect to all of the contract provisions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Claim ¶ 24 JMS argues that the trial court erred in granting CAT's motion for partial summary judgment regarding whether there was an oral contract among Mehr, Taggart, and Coats obligating CAT to fund all of the Newport projects.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A party is entitled to summary judgment only where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.