State v. Visser’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Davis v. Meno Guaranty Bank of Meno · State v. Gibbons · Uintah Oil Ass'n v. County Board of Equalization · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a rigid colloquy or rote recitation of the elements of Rule 11 is not required, ... Rule l1(e) 'requires the trial court [during the plea colloquy] to find that seven detailed and specific criteria have been fulfilled”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tarnawiecki“perfectly adequate language to explain to this defendant, under the circumsiances, those legal concepts encompassed by the provisions of Rule 11(e).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Visser“the trial court's belief that he had covered each of these rights in a manner sufficient for the defendant to understand them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Visser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.