Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 217 - Pacific Development, L.C. v. Orton

Pacific Development, L.C. v. Orton’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2022

4 state decisions

201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Liteky v. United States · Tennessee v. Middlebrooks · Valcarce v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe ... that Pacific's manifest disregard argument simply amounts to a "manifest disagreement" with the arbitrator's findings and final award. The arbitrator specifically recognized the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, but concluded that Pacific had not met its burden of proving Orton wasted material. Without a factual basis for Pacific's allegation, the arbitrator found no support for Pacific's argument that Orton had breached its implied duty of good faith. Thus, we conclude the arbitrator did not manifestly disregard the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “their conduct and mutual consent, submitted Plat B issues for resolution, expanding the scope of the arbitrator's jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Manifest disregard of the law is a judicially created doctrine stemming from the exceeding authority statutory ground.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.