Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 262 - State v. Friesen

State v. Friesen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · State v. Pena · State v. Lopez · Swenson v. Sanborn County Farmers Union Oil Co. · Provo City v. Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the facts about which an officer must have a reasonable ar-ticulable suspicion at the time of a traffic stop are those regarding the conduct of the person stopped, not the nature of the law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether this objective standard has been met, the focus necessarily centers upon the facts known to the officer immediately before the stop.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.