State v. Navanick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, we will not overturn [its] factual findings absent clear error' The trial court's legal conclusions, however, we review for correctness.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Collins · 2001 UT App 332 - State v. Valenzuela

2. “Should doubt as to the correct identity of the subject of the warrant arise, the arresting officer obviously should make immediate reasonable efforts to confirm or deny the applicability of the warrant to the detained individual. If, after such reasonable efforts, the officer reasonably and in good faith believes that the suspect is the one against whom the warrant is outstanding, a [search] pursuant to the arrest of that person in not in contravention of the Fourth Amendment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 161 Md. App. 429 - Dett v. State

3. “The trial court's legal conclusions [made regarding a motion to suppress], however, we review for correctness.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2003 UT App 410 - State v. Rynhart