State v. Jarman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott · State ex rel. A.R. & C.P. v. C.R. · Orton v. Carter · State v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because the acts constituting a probation violation could also give rise to a criminal prosecution, the exclusionary rule's application to criminal prosecutions already deters unreasonable searches and seizures of probationers.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. A.C.C. v. State · In Re ACC“parole officers 'are undoubtedly aware that any unconstitutionally seized evidence that could lead to an indictment could be suppressed in a criminal trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. A.C.C. v. State · In Re ACC“the social costs outweigh the benefit of deterrence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. A.C.C. v. State · In Re ACC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.