Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 270 - State v. Pizel

State v. Pizel’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott · Orton v. Carter · State v. Brandley · State v. Bean · State v. Jarman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court then found that Pizel had violated the terms of probation, revoked and reinstated probation, imposed a suspended sentence, and ordered Pizel to serve sixty days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.