Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 273 - State v. Watson

State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 99 Or. App. 112 - State v. Voetberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he statute requires that responsibility for the criminal conduct be firmly established, much like a guilty plea, before the court can order restitution.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen a person is convicted of criminal activity that has resulted in pecuniary damages, in addition to any other sentence it may impose, the court shall order that the defendant make restitution to the victims ..., or for conduct for which the defendant has agreed to make restitution as part of a plea agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “La) court may order restitution only if the defendant has been convicted of a crime that resulted in pecuniary damages and agrees to pay restitution or admits to the criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.