Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 278 - Johnson v. Higley

Johnson v. Higley’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co. · Homer v. Smith · Sandy Island Corp. v. Ragsdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' On appeal from a bench trial, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court's findings, and therefore recite the facts consistent with that standard.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Only if the party is necessary, but the court finds joinder unfeasible, must the court address indispensability under [rJule 19(b).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[plaintiffs'] claims were expressly limited to [the defendants'] acts or omissions”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.