Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UTAPP 310 - Boudreaux v. State

Boudreaux v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182

Relies on Michigan v. Doran · Collins v. Loisel · New Mexico Ortiz v. Reed · Orton v. Carter · Noble v. Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the party against whom issue preclusion is asserted must have been a party to or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “having committed acts in Utah which resulted in a crime being committed in Kentucky.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.