Sellers v. Bancroft’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2001
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 16 Del. Ch. 289 - Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co. · 17 Del. Ch. 39 - Maddock v. Vorclone Corp. · King v. Ligon and Four Other Cases
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““So long as any Preferred Stock shall remain outstanding, then without the affirmative vote or written consent of the holders of 75% of the shares of Preferred Stock at the time outstanding, the designations, preferences and voting powers of the Preferred Stock, and the restrictions and qualifications thereof, shall not be changed or altered; provided, however, that the par value, dividend rate and redemption price of the Preferred Stock, and the amount payable to the holders thereof in the event of the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, shall not be reduced -without the affirmative vote or written consent of the holders of one hundred per cent (100%) of the shares of Preferred Stock at the time outstanding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The Certificate of Incorporation may also contain provisions requiring for any corporate action the vote of a larger proportion of the stock or any class thereof than is required by this Chapter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.