¶1dissented, and concurred with the supreme court,—citing Garfield v. Hatmaker, 15 N. Y. 475, and expressing the opinion that the statute vested the title in the alienee*
¶2*258Order reversed and judgment on report of referee affirmed, with costs.
2 Abb. Ct. App. 256
Gilbert v. Gilbert
Decided March 15, 1864
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1864-03-15
Gashton R. and Erseba Gilbert, by I. Y. Matthews, their guardian ad litem, brought this action against William Gilbert, in the supreme court, for the specific performance of an agreement between defendant and William Gilbert, Sr., deceased, the father of the plaintiffs. The father of the plaintiffs, in his lifetime, had contracted with one Winter, for the purchase of land from Winter, and the latter had given his bond to convey.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1874
1 state decisions
Relies on Garfield v. . Hatmaker
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1864-03-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →