Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Abb. N. Cas. 105

Darling v. Halsey

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1876

New York Supreme Court · decided 1876-12-15

Augusta Berwick lived with and was taken care of by Louisa A. Darling for some time before her death. In her will, after directing the payment of her debts, she requested that the kind friends with whom she was living should be well rewarded for their care of her, but did not direct any certain amount to be paid. After her death, the plaintiff presented a bill for the care, &c., of the decedent to Lawrence W. Halsey, the executor of the will.

Decided 1876-12-15

Brady, J.

¶1In this matter the demand was resisted, I think, unreasonably. The claims of the plaintiff on the estate were recognized by the testatrix and referred to in her will, as stated on the argument. This incident withdraws this case from the general rule applicable to similar proceedings, and warrants an award of costs and an allowance to be paid out of the estate. The defendants could have by proper inquiry established, doubtless, the amount of the claim, which alone was disputed, if indeed anything was in controversy. The claim was not gainsaid by any proof, and the plaintiff should not be subjected to the expense of proving her rights. Costs and an allowance of $25 granted.

¶2Ordered accordingly.

/2/abbncas/105 · .json · Public domain