¶1Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion granted, upon the ground that it appears from the agreement between the parties that its purpose is to violate the Insurance Law with regard to sharing agents’ commissions. Nothing contained in the affidavits changes the effect of the agreement, as pleaded and written. Judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Bastow, JJ.
2 A.D.2d 878
Friedman v. Marco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 1956
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1956-11-07
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1956-11-07
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2015
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →