¶1dissentiente. He said, that to sustain the petition in this case, was indulging the mortgagees in a very useless proceeding--~That he had made up his mind at the last term, that the non-suit ought not to be set aside, and he had seen no reason to alter his opinion.
2 Aik. 410
Munroe v. Walbridge
Decided February 15, 1827
Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1827-02-15
THIS was a petition for partition of lands in Bennington. The defendants pleaded, That the petitioner had no title, &c. on which issue was joined. On the trial of this issue, by a jury, at the February term of this Court, 1823, the petitioner offered the following evidence, which was admitted. 1. Moses Sage’s deed to Joshua Munroe, dated the 18th day of February, 1806, of one undivided equal fourth part of the premises; consideration, $1040.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1827-02-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2016
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →