Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ALA 181 - Barnett v. Stanton

Barnett v. Stanton’s Empirical Analysis

1841

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
9
states following
January 1939
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently January 1939 · most notably Southern Development Co of Nevada v. Silva (1888), Elliott v. Howison (1906)

5 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

1301841185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A contract cannot be rescinded without mutual consent, where circumstances have been so altered by a part execution, that the parties cannot be put in statu quo.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.