Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ALAAPP 207 - Shell v. State

Shell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1985

12 state decisions

3019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People ex rel. Drake v. Mahaney · State v. Rogers · Lothrop · Davenport v. Caldwell · Lowery v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is evident that in adopting the above act, the Legislature intended that the circuit court, when held at Pell City— a place where it could not be held, unless expressly so provided by law— should be as distinct- from the same court when held at the county seat as if the Southern division of the county was, in fact, a separate county. When the circuit court sits in the Northern division of the county, it has no jurisdiction over causes of action triable in the Southern division, and vice versa; and for all practical purposes the two courts are as distinct as if they existed under two independent legislative acts. In legal contemplation, both courts are but the circuit court of the county; but for all the practical purposes of administering justice they are as distinct from each other as are the circuit courts of two different counties. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.