2 Ariz. App. 232 - State v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably 2 Ariz. App. 510 - State v. Martin (1966), 2 Ariz. App. 593 - Peterson v. Jacobson (1966)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kuhnley · State v. Corvelo · State v. Smith · Eyman v. Cumbo · Campbell v. Thurman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * that where an amended information is filed as distinguished from an amendment to an information * * the defendant must be rearraigned on the amended information.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““This Court is not bound by a confession of error in a criminal case and it has undertaken to examine the record.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Percharo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.