2 Ariz. App. 310 - Manning v. Reilly’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School District (1967), 27 Ariz. App. 600 - Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp. (1976)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Ill. 2d 370 - Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton Park · Phipps v. City of Chicago · 217 Cal. App. 2d 480 - Williams v. City of San Bruno · Gay v. City of Lyons · Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An Arizona municipality must comply with the following requirements of A.R.S. §§ 9-462 and 9-463 prior to enactment of a zoning ordinance: (a) Its zoning commission must make a preliminary report recommending both the boundaries of and the regulations to be enforced in various original districts. (b) Its zoning commission must hold public hearings on the preliminary report and then must submit its final report to the municipality’s governing body. (c) After receipt of this final report, the governing body must hold a public hearing, on 15 days published notice. * * * * * * Ordinances enacted without substantial compliance with the statutory requirements are void. * * # * * * The requirements for enacting a zoning ordinance applicable to appellees’ property were not complied with. Notwithstanding the City’s prerogative to disregard the report which is advisory in nature, it could not proceed without receipt of a final report containing zoning recommendations.” (Emphasis Theirs) 2 Ariz.App. at 312, 313 , 408 P.2d at 416, 417 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In order to serve as a basis for declaratory relief, a controversy involving a statute or ordinance must be justiciable, i. e., there must be specific adverse claims, based upon present rather than future or speculative facts, which are ripe for judicial determination. A mere difference of opinion as to the constitutionality of legislation does not afford a basis for declaratory relief. 22 Am.Jur. 2d, Declaratory Judgment § 26. * * * A declaratory judgment proceeding to obtain an advisory judgment or to an swer a moot or abstract question will not lie.” 2 Ariz.App. at 314 , 408 P.2d 414 at 418 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.