2 Ariz. App. 314 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1984 · most notably 6 Ariz. App. 80 - State v. Zaragosa (1967), State v. Turner (1984)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Harris v. United States · New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Basic constitutional rights should not depend upon the technicality of when an arrest is made. We hold that the circumstances presented to the trial court were such that the court was justified in finding that the search, made at 2:30 a. m., and the seizure, made either at 2:30 a. m. or 4:30 a. m., were reasonable. We do not believe that the trial court was mandated under the facts of this case to find that the conduct of these officers falls within the category of ‘ * * * rude invasions of privacy * * *’ (81 Sup.Ct.1694), which were condemned in Mapp.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.