2 Ariz. App. 497 - Ream v. Wendt’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Ruth v. Industrial Commission (1971), Kneip v. Herseth (1974)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steward v. Industrial Commission · Adkins v. Industrial Commission · Alabam's Freight Co. v. Hunt · Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission · Pressley v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * and, provided further, in order to assure and make certain a just and humane compensation law in the State of Arizona, for the relief and-protection of such workmen, their widows, children or dependents, as defined by law, from the burdensome, expensive and litigious remedies for injuries to or death of such workmen, now existing in the State of Arizona, and producing uncertain and unequal compensation therefor, such employee, engaged in such private employment, may exercise the option to settle for compensation by failing to reject the provisions of such Workmen’s Compensation Law prior to the injury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The Legislature shall enact a Workmen’s Compensation Law applicable to workmen engaged in manual or mechanical labor ... by which compensation shall be required to be paid to any such workman, in case of his injury ... by his employer ... provided that it shall be optional with any employee engaged in any such private employment to settle for such compensation, or to retain the right to sue said employer ... such employee, engaged in such private employment, may exercise the option to settle for compensation by failing to reject the provisions of such Workmen’s Compensation Law prior to the injury____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Every public agency as defined in § 11-951 for which an intergovernmental agreement or contract is in effect shall post a notice pursuant to the provisions of § 23-906, in substantially the following form: “All employees are hereby further notified that they may be required to work under the jurisdiction or control of or within the jurisdictional boundaries of another public agency pursuant to an intergovern mental agreement or contract, and under such circumstances they are deemed by the laws of Arizona to be employees of both public agencies for the purposes of workers’ compensation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Callan v. Bernini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.