2 Ariz. App. 543 - McClain v. Sinclair’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barnes v. Smith · Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya · Stallcup v. Rathbun · Standard Oil Co. of California v. Shields · Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. De Vore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““After he has considered this point on a motion for new trial and approved the verdict by overruling the motion, the appellate [court] [sic] should never disturb the finding and judgment of the trial court, except for the gravest reasons * * 2 Ariz.App. 544 , 410 P.2d 500 (1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ‘ * * * The adequacy of a jury’s award is a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the trial court, and will not be disturbed on appeal unless it appears that the amount is without support in the evidence.’ ” 2 Ariz.App. at 544 , 410 P.2d at p. 501 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.