2 Ariz. App. 580 - State v. Owen’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Pena (1983), State v. Burchett (1971)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Vineyard · State v. Cuzick · 163 Tex. Crim. 283 - Ex Parte Hamilton · Ex parte Johnson · Chee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * A judgment must be reasonably construed in accordance with the intent of the trial court, if the language discloses such intent clearly and without doubt or obscurity. * * * ” Hogan v. Hill, 12 F.Supp. 873, 874 (1935).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In Ex parte Hamilton, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 283 , 290 S.W.2d 673 (1956), the Texas court stated that several requirements were recommended to cumulate effectively a subsequent sentence. These are the inclusion in the subsequent sentence of (1) the case number of the prior conviction, (2) the correct name of the court in which the prior conviction was had, (3) the date of the prior conviction, and (4) the term of years assessed in the prior case. In the interest of accuracy, trial courts should provide a full description of the prior proceedings so as to identify fully the prior convictions and sentence upon which the subsequent cumulative sentence is based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pena“A sentence is a final judgment and it should be sufficient on its face to effect its purpose without resort to evidence in aid thereof, and should further convey to the authorities clear and unequivocal orders of the trial court so that they may know definitely how long to detain the convict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chase v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.