Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Ariz. App. 585 - Patch v. Buros

2 Ariz. App. 585 - Patch v. Buros’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1982

15 state decisions

110196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Birmingham · Rogers v. Tapo · Zugsmith v. Mullins · 2 Ariz. App. 395 - Haechler v. Andrews · 2 Ariz. App. 609 - Arizona State Retirement Board v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The above sequence of events, together with matters presented on oral argument persuades us to assume that the Supreme Court’s order of 6 October 1964, dismissing the appeal in its cause number 8410 was entered for the reason that there was an attempt to appeal in relation to the minute entry of 24 January and that there was not a timely appeal in relation to the formal order of 31 January granting the motion for new trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““58(d) Objections to form. 1. In case of a judgment other than for money or costs, or that all relief be denied, the judgment shall not be settled, approved and signed until the expiration of five days after the proposed form thereof has been served upon opposing counsel unless the opposite party or his counsel endorses on the judgment an approval as to form. This subdivision shall not apply to parties in default.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““* * * we need not decide whether or not a denial of a motion for new trial for non-compliance * * * must be reduced to a formal written order or judgment to be appealable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.