2 Ariz. App. 6 - State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Benge (1974), State v. Kevil (1974)
2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Turnbow · State v. McLain · State v. McGee · McGinnis v. United States · District of Columbia v. Little
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(§ 13-801) “A. A parent who wilfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter or medical attention for his or her minor child is guilty of misdemeanor .... (§ 13-822) A. A person who by any act, causes, encourages or contributes to the dependency or delinquency of a child, as defined by § 13-821, ... is guilty of a misdemeanor .... (§ 13-842) A. A person having custody of a minor under sixteen years of age who wil-fully causes or permits the life of such minor to be endangered, its health to be injured or its moral welfare to be imperiled, by neglect, abuse or immoral associations, is guilty of a misdemeanor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““These statements would obviously be hearsay unless they are admissible under the ‘excited utterance’ or ‘spontaneous exclamation’ exception to the hearsay rule. The requisites for an ‘excited utterance’ are as follows: 1. There must be a startling event. 2. The words spoken must be spoken soon after the event so ;as not to give the person speaking the words a time to fabricate. 3. The words spoken must relate to the startling event. State v. McLain, 74 Ariz. 132 , 245 P.2d 278 (1952).” State v. Hunt, 2 Ariz.App. 6, 16 , 406 P.2d 208, 218 (1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dixon““An act or omission which is made punishable in different ways by different sections of the laws may be punished under either, but in no event under more than one. An acquittal or conviction and sentence under either one bars a prosecution for the same act or omission under any other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Duran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.