2 Ariz. App. 66 - Gillette v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2002
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc. · 120 Ind. App. 300 - Aetna Securities Co. v. Sickels · Fisk v. Baker · Marsh v. Riskas · Coulas v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question of whether a sufficient showing of excusable neglect has been made is usually within the judicial discretion of the trial court. It will not be disturbed on appeal unless it appears that there has been abuse of that court’s discretion.” Gillette v. Lanier, 2 Ariz.App. 66 at 68 , 406 P.2d 416, at 418 (1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hansen v. Brugliera“Under such circumstances however the court may proceed to hear the plaintiffs evidence in the same manner as though the defendant were present and, if a prima facie case is established, may render appropriate judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.