Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ark. 252

Alexander v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1847

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1847-01-15

Trover, by Alexander as administrator of Payne, against Foreman determined in the Benton circuit court at the Nov. term 1845, before Sneed, judge. The defendant pleaded former action pending at the commencement of the suit, plaintiff replied nul tiel record, to which defendant joined issue. The cause was submitted to the court, and the court found for defendant, and rendered judgment that the suit abate.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1956

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1847-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Oldham, J.

¶1The plea and replication put in issue the existence of a record of the court in which this cause was tried. The records of the court are placed in the custody and safe keeping of the clerk, and it is always presumed that he faithfully performs that duty, and safely preserves the records of his office until the contrary is made to appear. If such a record as averred by the plea had existed, there was higher and better evidence of the fact than the parol evidence introduced by the defendant. He should have produced the record itself, or should have first established the loss by competent evidence, when he would have been permitted to introduce a regularly authenticated or sworn copy. The case of Smith vs. Dudley, 2 Ark. R. 62, fully determines the question here presented. Let the judgment of the circuit court be reversed and the cause remanded.

/2/ark/252 · .json · Public domain