Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ARKAPP 200 - Oxford v. Daniels

Oxford v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2026

21 state decisions

6019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wojcik v. Board of Review · Harmon v. Laney · Dahman v. Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether or not any work is suitable for an individual and in determining the existence of good cause for voluntarily leaving his work under subsection (a) of this section, there shall be considered among other factors, and in addition to those enumerated in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the degree of risk involved to his health, safety and morals, his physical fitness and prior training, his experience and prior earnings, the length of his unemployment, his prospects for obtaining work in his customary occupation, the distance of available work from his residence and prospects for obtaining local work.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The appellant should not be penalized because he made a mistake and accepted a job for which he was unsuited. It is evident that he accepted the job in good faith, hoping that he could handle it. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.