Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ARKAPP 204 - Dicus v. Allen

Dicus v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2014

8 state decisions

401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Omohundro v. Ottenheimer · Carroll v. Reed · Ewart v. Squire · McKinley v. Hilliard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe that it would be inherently unfair to permit appellees to take these inconsistent positions, and we, therefore, hold that they are estopped from rejecting the Whitfield survey when they had relied on it only one year before their dispute arose with Appellants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.