Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ARKAPP 216 - Fausett Co. v. Rand

Fausett Co. v. Rand’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rounds & Porter Lumber Co. v. Burns · Banks v. Jones · Black & White, Inc. v. Love · Young v. Dodson · Brown v. Aquilino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven if the facts are not in dispute, if reasonable minds might differ as to the conclusions to be drawn from those facts, summary judgment may not be entered. (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the corporate form has been illegally abused to the injury of a third person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.