Paladino v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · King v. State · Dunn v. State · Taylor v. State · Rhea v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By its own language, the statute only requires that there be corroboration by evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense and that this evidence go beyond a showing that the crime was committed and the circumstances thereof. We have, therefore, consistently held that the corroborating evidence need not be sufficient in and of itself to sustain a conviction, but it need only, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, tend in some degree to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, (quoting King v. State, 254 Ark. 509 , 494 S.W.2d 476 (1973), and Dunn & Whisenhunt v. State, 256 Ark. 508 , 508 S.W.2d 555 (1974)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stephens v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.