Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ARKAPP 325 - Spicer v. State

Spicer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rust v. Johnson · Carter v. Hewitt · Gustafson v. State · United States v. McClintic · Spears v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Counsel for the State had a right to question appellant on cross-examination as to prior arrests, in the circumstances, in an effort to show that he had not truthfully answered the above questions propounded by his own counsel on direct examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.