Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Bedell 4 - Higgins v. . Sharp

Higgins v. . Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
12
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Johnson v. . Johnson (1912), Hunt v. Hunt (1909)

55 state decisions — followed in 12 states

140190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brinkley v. . Brinkley · Griffin v. . Griffin · O'Dea v. . O'Dea · North v. North

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It seems to us, therefore, that actions to annul a marriage are governed, with respect to alimony and counsel fee, by the same principle as all other actions for divorce.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.