Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 B.T.A. 229

Lindheim v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1925-06-30

Relies on Backer v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-06-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1979 · most notably Kornhauser v. United States (1928), Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. F Tellier (1966)

4 federal appellate ·

210192519301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1These are appeals from the determination of deficiencies in income taxes of Lindheim for the year 1919, in the amount of $688.67, of Kaufmann for the years 1919 and 1920, in the amounts of $135.37 and $180.99, respectively, and of Hays for the years 1919 and 1920, in the amounts of $1,009.68 and $196.85, respectively.

¶2The appeals involve the same question of law and were joined for the purpose of this proceeding.

¶3FINDINGS OP FACT.

¶4The taxpayers are citizens and residents of the State of New York, and, during the taxable period here in question, were engaged in the practice of law as a copartnership under the name of Hays, Kauf-mann, and Lindheim, with their offices in New York City.

¶5During the years 1919 and 1920 the said copartnership expended the amounts of $8,140.85 and $22,653.58, respectively, under circumstances outlined below.

¶6During these years the taxpayers were indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for violation of the criminal provisions of the Trading With the Enemy Act, and expended the sums above mentioned defending themselves against the said charges. The Commissioner has disallowed the deduction of these amounts in the returns of the partnership, claiming that they were not legitimate business expenses but were personal expenses of the individuals.

¶7DECISION.

¶8The determination of the Commissioner is approved. Appeal of Sarah Backer, 1 B. T. A. 214.

/2/bta/229 · .json · Public domain