Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 BTA 777 - Langenbach v. Commissioner

Langenbach v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
November 1935
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · United States v. Phellis · Weiss v. Stearn · Marr v. United States · Rockefeller v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here the corporation declared and the stockholder received a cash dividend, which, were it not for his voluntary contract, he had under his complete dominion. At thé moment of its receipt he realized income, and what he did with it thereafter, irrespective of how soon, can not change its character at that time. Appeal of Regal Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 896; Appeal of E. C. Huffman, 1 B. T. A. 52. It is our opinion, therefore, that the taxpayer can not' escape tax because the amounts received were incidental to the reorganization.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The argument that we must regard substance and not form is elusive, for its adoption leaves us confronted with the equally difficult task of distinguishing form from substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.