Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Cai. Cas. 102

Cross v. Hobson

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1804

New York Supreme Court · decided 1804-08-15

This was an application to be discharged out of custody the defendant having been exonerated from the demand under the insolvent law.

Decided 1804-08-15

*Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant can take nothing by his motion. In the cause of Caldwell v. Graham, decided in January term, 1803, we determined we would not help an insolvent who omitted to plead his discharge as he might have done.[1]

¶2Motion denied.

¶3 See case of Shaw v. Wilmerden, 2 Cai. R. 38; Van Valkenbergh v. Dederick, 1 J. C 133; see Billings v. Skutt, 1 J. C. 105.

/2/caicas/102 · .json · Public domain