¶1Upon examination of the record in this case, we are satisfied that there is no error, and that the appeal was prosecuted merely for delay.
¶2The judgment of the Court below is therefore affirmed, v with costs, and 10 per cent, damages.
2 Cal. 158
Russell v. Williams
Decided April 15, 1852
California Supreme Court · decided 1852-04-15
The respondent sued the appellants as the makers of a promissory note, payable to the plaintiff, or order. The process was returned served on all the defendants. No answer being filed within the time prescribed by law, their default was entered on the 9th of December, 1850; and final judgment entered on the 16th of the same month. The defendants appealed on the 4th of March, 1851.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1919
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1852-04-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →