Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Cal. 355

Bates v. Visher

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1852

California Supreme Court · decided 1852-10-15

This was an appeal from the Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The complaint stated, that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff $4,117, for the recovery of which the suit was brought. The amount was made up of several items, of which an account was stated and annexed to the complaint.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1919

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydeneeldt, Justice.

¶2The error relied on to reverse this judgment, is, that the trial was by referees, and not by a jury, and that the reference was not authorized. On looking into the record, it appears that there is an entry upon the minutes, which recites that “ the parties came by their attorneys, and defendant by his attorney, moved the Court, that the cause be referred,” &c. Thus the reference was made on the appellant’s motion, and in one of the modes pointed out by law “ by oral consent in . open Court entered on the minutes.”

¶3It is only necessary to state thus much to show that the ob*358jection is entirely unsupported. Indeed the case must be treated as a delay case, and the judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages and costs.

¶4Anderson, Justice, concurred.

/2/cal/355 · .json · Public domain