Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Cal. 385

Benedict v. Hoggin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1852

California Supreme Court · decided 1852-10-15

This was an action brought against the defendant, administrator of the estate of William Taylor, deceased, to recover @6,500 claimed by plaintiff for cattle sold to Taylor during his lifetime, in 1849.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1957

3 state decisions

1018521860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydenfeldt, Justice.

¶2The 135th section of the “act to regulate the settlement of the estates of deceased persons,” provides, that “when a claim is rejected either by an executor, or administrator, or the probate judge, the holder shall bring suit in the proper Court against the executor or administrator within three months after the date of its rejection, if it be then due, or within three months after it becomes due, otherwise the claim shall be forever barred.”

¶3The District Court was asked to charge that such was the law, and the evidence contained in the statement shows that the charge requested was proper and relevant. I can see no reason for its refusal; such is the expressly written law of the land, and obedience to it must be exacted.

¶4Let the judgment be reversed, with costs.

¶5Murray, Chief Justice.—I concur.

/2/cal/385 · .json · Public domain