People v. Deysher’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently June 2000 · most notably Himmelfarb v. United States (1949), 114 Cal. App. 2d 680 - People v. Frankfort (1952)
2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Tom Woo · 68 Cal. App. 592 - Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. Wheeler · 90 Cal. App. 519 - County of Shasta v. Moody · Tuscan v. Smith · People v. Hennessey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Neither the briefs nor our own investigation has disclosed any case deciding what facts sufficiently establish such an interest in a public contract as will subject an officer to punishment under said section 71 or similar statute. But aid can be obtained from civil cases considering the sufficiency of evidence to prove such an interest of an officer in a public contract as to invalidate it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hooten“financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.