2 Cal. 3d 362 - People v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 474 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 495 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 35 Cal. 3d 547 - People v. Beeman (1984), 27 Cal. 3d 1 - People v. Green (1980)
3 federal appellate · 474 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Pointer v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 495 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that state of facts as would lead a man of ordinary care and prudence to believe and conscientiously entertain an honest and strong suspicion that the person is guilty of a crime.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * it is also probable that only one who expects his guilt to be proved at trial will attempt an escape and that an innocent man will stay for trial in order to clear his name and win lawful liberty. [ 85 Cal. Rptr. at 430 , 466 P. 2d at 982 ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining whether questioning constitutes a process of interrogations, we must `analyze the total situation which envelops the questioning by considering such factors as the length of the interrogation, the place and time of the interrogation, the nature of the questions, the conduct of the police and all other relevant circumstances.' [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.