Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Cal. App. 70 - Culp v. Culp

2 Cal. App. 70 - Culp v. Culp’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
6
states following
June 1955
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 1955 · most notably Boardman v. Boardman (1948), 28 Cal. 2d 243 - Crouch v. Crouch (1946)

26 state decisions

170190519101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Whitman · Grover Baker Co v. Radcliffe · Starbuck v. Murray · In re Estate of James · Miles v. Miles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any judicial record may be impeached by evidence of a want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer, of collusion between the parties, or of fraud in the party offering the record, in respect to the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.