2 Cal. App. 2d 21 - McLean v. Ladewig’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1974
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. · Newport v. Hatton · Baar v. Smith · Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co. · Freeman v. Gray-Cowan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notices of location are to be liberally construed. * * * At 40 Corpus Juris, p. 805, it is said in referring to the sufficiency of the location notice: `If it is made in good faith, it should receive a liberal and reasonable construction in favor of the locator; and if by such construction the language employed in describing the claim, when taken in connection with the markings on the ground and other surrounding circumstances, will enable a reasonably intelligent person to find the claim, and trace its boundaries, and therefore imparts notice thereof to subsequent locators, it is sufficient.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Masek v. Ostlund
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.