Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Cal. App. 2d 748

Grossman v. Ardery

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1934

California Court of Appeal · decided 1934-12-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1970

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-12-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

In the Matter of the Application of EDGAR M. GROSSMAN, Publisher, to Establish the Standing of "El Heraldo de Mexico" of Los Angeles, California, as a Newspaper of General Circulation. EDGAR M. GROSSMAN, Respondent,
v.
ROY E. ARDERY, Appellant.

Civ. No. 8291.

¶1California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One.

December 8, 1934.

¶2 Stanley F. Maurseth, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe and Kenneth K. Wright for Appellant.

¶3 Chotiner, Recht & Chotiner for Respondent.

¶4 Carroll H. Smith, as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Appellant.

¶5 Memorandum

¶6 Houser, J.

¶7 The appeal herein is from a judgment by which a newspaper printed in the Spanish language and known as "El Heraldo de Mexico" was adjudicated a newspaper "of general circulation", within the meaning and intent of the provisions of sections 4458 to 4465, inclusive, of the Political Code.

¶8 [1] With the general exception that a comparatively small part of the newspaper in question was printed in the English language, to all intents and purposes the situation of the newspaper in regard to a compliance with the requirements *749 contained in the Constitution of this state and the statute to which reference hereinbefore has been had does not differ from that more particularly set forth in the opinion this day filed in the Matter of L'Italo-Americano, Civil No. 8290 (ante, p. 690 [38 PaCal.2d 810]). Relying upon the decision in that case as authority applicable to the facts herein, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, reversed.

¶9 Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.

/2/calapp2d/748 · .json · Public domain