Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Conn. App. 179 - Jackson v. Jackson

2 Conn. App. 179 - Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Billington v. Billington (1991), Grayson v. Grayson (1985)

2 district · 84 state decisions

4401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Euge · Miller v. Appleby · Monroe v. Monroe · Kaplan v. Kaplan · Kenworthy v. Kenworthy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) There must have been no laches or unreasonable delay by the injured party after the fraud was discovered. (2) There must have been diligence in the original action, that is, diligence in trying to discover and expose the fraud. (3) There must be clear proof of the perjury or fraud. (4) There must be a substantial likelihood that the result of the new trial will be different.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “To constitute fraud by non-disclosure . . . there must be a failure to disclose known facts and . . . a request or an occasion or a circumstance which imposes a duty to speak.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]he key element in a case of fraudulent nondisclosure is that there must be circumstances which impose a duty to speak.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.