¶1said it was now too late to move to quash the writ; and that they were inclined to think that the statute of Maryland was directory only, and that the writ was not void merely on that account. (See the case of Orr v. Ingle, December, 1819, ante, 193.)
2 D.C. 227
Haller v. Beall
Decided April 15, 1821
after issue joined, and the jury was about to be sworn, moved the Court to quash the writ of replevin, because the clerk had taken the bond with one surety only.
Decided 1821-04-15