Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 D.C. 26

Fox v. Ickes

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1935-07-01

Decided 1935-07-01

BAILEY, J.

¶1It appears from the proposed amended bills that the orders made by the defendant are not authorized by Congress, and had they been so authorized, would have deprived the plaintiffs of vested rights. The suits are not brought against the United States but to set aside unauthorized acts of the defendant in cases in which he has no discretionary powers, and is acting arbitrarily.

¶2The motions for .leave to file the amended bills will be granted.

/2/dc/26 · .json · Public domain